|
INTRODUCING HUMANITARIAN LAW
By Dr Neville Yeomans Psychiatrist, Barrister
Feedback & Email |
Donating
Information about donating to Laceweb Way
First published in the Laceweb 'Connexion Bulletin' in December 1974.
Integral or humanitarian law is distinct from State or utilitarian law.
Humanitarian law is concerned with the law of community, of
mediation, domestic relations, health-welfare, education and culture.
Until the Industrial Revolution it was the Canon Law administered by
the ecclesiastical courts of the Church. The confessional, forgiveness,
peace and the law of sanctuary and protection were part of humanitarian
justice and law.
Utilitarian law is the law of the State, of utility, of order,
business, war, contract, and crime - the law of ruthlessness,
retribution and punishment. In the last 200 years this law has uniquely
dominated the Western world and has swallowed the humane justice of
humanitarian law. It now enforces a State monopoly of all laws.
Thus the inquistitorial or enquiry technique of the religious
court is gone, the adversary of accusatory technique alone applies. The
search for truth is replaced by the clarification of issues and the
refinement of combat. Law-fare replaces warfare and the duel is with
words rather than swords. But is that enough?
Utility law, the law in our State monopoly, has worked on the basis of the reasonable man, not the humane
one. Disputes must by solved by reason, not intuition or humane
cooperation. The victor may be inhumane and morally heartless as long
as he has legal reasons - Efficancy suppressed humanity.
Yet this is now changing. Fortunately, dispute resolution by
consensus and mutuality still lives on. Mediation has been
re-established and modernised in China and Scandinavia, and is again
spreading throughout the World. As discussed in, 'Wither Goeth the Law
: Humanity or Barbarity' (Yeomans and Carlson - to be place on the
Laceweb site soon), mediation occurs where a third party guides
conflict resolution by mutual agreement and cooperation, rather than
accusation and imposed decision.
It is private rather than public, persuasive rather than
coercive, democratic rather than autocratic. The mediator is concerned
with the common well-being and dignity of the parties, not with
rewarding one and punishing the other. Integration rather than
vindication is the result.
Again, human and humanity rights have growing steadily in
recent decades. Since 1863 the Red Cross has been rebuilding cogent
humanitarian law, with Conventions on the protection of the injured in
warfare, progressing later to protection of prisoners of war,
civilians, and the shipwrecked; and ultimately leading to support for
the Universal Declaration and the 1966 International Conventions on
Human Rights. In 1969 the Law of Treaties introduced Cogent Law - 'a
peremptory norm of international law (jus cogens)'. These norms include
humane laws that even nations must not ignore. Again, in 1970 the
International Institute of Humanitarian Law was founded in San Remo,
Italy.
Thus we need respect for global norms, for humanity rather than
utility, for feeling, not just reason, for peace rather than war, and
for love rather than hate. Only in this way can we assist the rebirth
of that other half of dispute resolution that nearly died in the
furnace of Industrialism - humanitarian justice and law.
Feedback & Email |
Donating
Information about donating to Laceweb Way
Laceweb Home Page Size 3k.
Back to the Top
|